Sometimes, I just get the urge to look up a random horror movie. This
has provided some of the greatest moments in my cinematic life like
Haute Tension, and has also provided absolute garbage like
Night Shadow.
Given my obvious predilections for Science Fiction, more often than not
I’ll open up a Sci-Fi horror over another random movie, which led me to
this… interesting… piece of work. To this end I give you
Dracula 3000. This film (no relation to the better known
Dracula 2000)
is one of the most ridiculous movies I have ever watched. It starts off
innocuous enough, with a salvage team in the year 3000 coming across an
apparently abandoned ship transporting what amounts to a mausoleum, but
it quickly devolves as Dracula reveals his true ability: to make
ridiculous stereotypes into ridiculous stereotype vampires.
Let’s start with the characters. After all, we get such gems as
Humvee, who I guess is supposed to be a truck. He is alternately called
“Humvee” and “Hummer” which is either supposed to be some kind of joke,
or simply an innocent nickname written by a writer with half a clue. The
reason I say “half a clue” should become apparent shortly. Humvee,
played by Tommy Lister of “Friday”, is essentially the big, dumb black
muscle that the NAACP would likely prefer to be abolished from film and
whom a good number of rappers would still like the world to see them as.
Humvee’s purpose is to yell, break things, and be sensible by
comparison next to his friend 187.
You can get your groans out of the way now.
The only small, very, very small bit of redemption to this character
is that, despite his name, he’s not some sort of trigger-happy gangster.
Rather, Coolio (yes, that Coolio) plays an addict constantly looking
for his next fix. This character makes Tyrone Biggums of the Chappelle
Show look subtle. Oh sure, the stereotypical skinny black man whose only
goal is his next fix might
seem subtle enough, but wait until you see what happens when he becomes a vampire- the
only human that is transformed into a vampire in this film. Everything about
this character is over the top and ridiculous, and it would be
hilariously cheesy if I didn’t find this character so offensive.
Next comes Abraham Van Helsing, whom I suppose at times is expected
to be the main character. If his name isn’t a dead giveaway, this
character is the descendant of the famed vampire slayer. He discovers
this after the resident intellectual (the movie can’t be bothered to
make him interesting, so I can’t be bothered to figure out his name)
runs a Google search on “Vampires” and discovers that information about
them is fairly widespread.
Next we get Dracula. Er, Count Orlock. Well, I guess that’s one thing
for this film- it canonically links Nosferatu and Dracula by making
Orlock an alias of Dracula’s. If this has been done before, I stand
corrected, but as stands I find this the most positive and creative
thing about this film. Less positive and creative is the fact that
Dracula turns exactly one human into a vampire, and that person in each
of his forms has more screen time than Dracula/Orlock. At least if this
film was titled “
Blacula 3000” it would have been more transparent as to what it was really going for.
Our final character is just as big of a mess as the others. Aurora is
initially presented as a red herring, an attractive female offering to
Dracula in the traditional sense. She disappears offscreen with Dracula
the first time he appears, and returns with a wealth of knowledge about
the Count and his origins- all of the information he would
want his victims to know. After a long, drawn out bit of half-assed
interrogation, it is revealed that Aurora is an android- an undercover
officer investigating the crew, in fact. Naturally, Humvee wants to kill
her for this, but Van Helsing is intelligent enough to realize that a
superhuman machine who can not be turned into a Vampire is a pretty
useful asset when vampire killing is essential to your immediate
survival. Ignoring for the time being the fact that the film ends with
her announcing herself a retired pleasure bot and offering herself to
Humvee, in my opinion the use of Aurora is a major misstep in setting up
any kind of menace in Dracula.
Let me go into more detail about what happened. As I said, Aurora
disappeared with Dracula and returned, spouting facts about Dracula’s
past. She is interrogated, the men around her (the only other female
cast member having been killed shortly after 187 became a vampire)
outraged at the possibility of her consorting with a vampire or becoming
one. Van Helsing goes as far as to roughly grab her and examine her
neck, looking for bite marks, of which there is none. Clearly
conflicted, Aurora pauses before revealing her true identity as an
android and undercover agent. Helsing is scornful; apparently, there has
been a romance brewing between the two of them, although that in itself
is only very scarcely examined. The two go on to a room filled with
coffins, opening each one with the intention of killing any surviving
vampires. They reveal one, despite the fact that Dracula needed blood to
be able to regain physical form (most of the coffins are filled with
sand) and the fact that he told Aurora that he was the last of his kind.
Aurora hesitates with her stake, clearly struggling with brutally
killing even such an enemy as this, before Van Helsing takes it from her
hand and drives it through the female Vampire’s heart (perhaps of note,
this is only the second living female we’ve met in this film, and the
third individual in the film to be killed).
Now imagine this: after opening the last coffin, Van Helsing realizes
that Dracula is hidden somewhere aboard the ship, and they split up,
armed to find him. Van Helsing meets up with the man who is doing the
research, while Aurora meets up with Humvee in order to search another
section of the ship. Once Aurora and Humvee are isolated from Van
Helsing by both sound and sight, however, their dynamic changes
entirely. Aurora reveals herself to be Dracula, famous for his ability
to shift his form even in terrible films, which is the true reason why
she returned to the group unscathed. She reveals this to Humvee, but it
is already too late- he is already in Dracula’s grip, and will soon be a
far more fearsome vampire than the one he killed earlier.
It’s that kind of critical thought and truly examined mythology that
this film lacks. Sure, there are connections to classical Dracula lore-
the names I mentioned being obvious ones, but every name barring only
Humvee and 187 is borrowed from the original novel. Unfortunately, to
someone inclined to do the research, these are the only connections to
Bram Stoker to be found here, and to someone watching the film casually
on TV, there is even less connection to be seen. Based on the plot and
the character personalities, I find it most likely that these
connections appeared in the script for the sole reason of someone saying
“I don’t know what to name this character- let’s try looking up
‘Dracula’ for ideas”.
The setting of this world is equally… I’d call it unimaginative, but
I’m not exactly sure whether or not imagination is involved in
introducing planets named “Transylvania” and “Comptonia”- the first
being the home of vampires, despite their having been to Earth before,
the latter being a planet where marijuana and easy women can be found in
massive quantities. Perhaps one of 187′s favorite mind-altering
substances wrote the script?
I find the most interesting social statement of this film,
intentional or not, to be the fact that none of the characters have ever
met a living person who believed in any sort of religion. It’s unlikely
to find that kind of detail in a film unless the writers truly believe
religion to be a foolish, outdated concept themselves, yet I find no
other elements of recognizable Atheist ideology (the most recognizable
and expected being Communism) in this film, nor do I find the kind of
critical thought that would imply the author to be in the Stephen
Hawking school of “too smart for God” Atheism. Perhaps I am merely
reading too far into this, but I was rather surprised when such a point
was made of this (“I supposedly had a Grand-uncle who believed in God”)
not to continue on with any sort of spiritual, scientific or political
follow-up.
I’m really not sure who the target audience was. By having some
fairly known actors in this film, it almost seems to have some attempt
at mainstream appeal, or even to be an urban comedy. At the same time,
the characters Humvee and 187 are, if not necessarily racist, still such
blatant and offensive stereotypes that I could hardly imagine any black
actor in the 2000s being willing to play them. This film just seems to
be an attempt to use up a budget as quickly as possible in a manner that
is neither Sci-Fi, horror, nor entirely truly film. I can’t say I
recommend anybody go out of their way to watch this film, which leaves
it firmly in the category of 1/10.