Star Wars Book Review: Empire and Rebellion: Razor's Edge by Martha Wells



Martha
Wells is a new author to the
Star Wars
universe. It's about time for me to pull apart one of her books and
see what she's about.
Razor's Edge
is a part of
Empire and Rebellion,
a trilogy of novels set during the years of the first
Star
Wars
films. Well I say a
trilogy, I mean a trilogy kicked off by an “unrelated” Timothy
Zahn book to draw the Expanded Universe audience back to the era.
Well, I say a trilogy plus one, I mean an era that has enough comics
and novels to definitively prove that Han, Luke and Leia did not have
time to sleep between Death Stars. Well, I say that, I mean I like
that scene from “Army of Ghosts” a little too much. In any case,
Razor's Edge is set in
the general vicinity of
Splinter of the Mind's Eye,
Allegiance, Choices
of One
and Scoundrels,
though I think I can more definitively state that it is set later
than
Scoundrels but
before
Allegiance,
giving us a freelancer Han who has come to enjoy Leia's company, a
Leia who doesn't know what to think about Han and has come to trust
Luke, and a Luke who is still a green recruit with something to
prove.






It
is with this cast that we embark on the story of
Razor's
Edge
, in which Leia's diplomatic
mission – with Han Solo as escort – is attacked by both Imperials
and pirates, each of which seems to know a lot more about their
movements than they have any right to. It's not long from there
before Han and Leia become captives of the pirates, and Luke and
Chewbacca are dispatched to rescue them.






If
this sounds like a standard
Star Wars
set-up, you're right, but it does deviate from the mold. Where from
one of the long-time
Star Wars
authors, such as Timothy Zahn, Kevin J. Anderson, or Aaron Allston
this set up would include a story about Luke and Chewie's exploits up
until their rendezvous with Leia's group, in
Razor's Edge
Well slices this side story off like one might trim the fat from the
side of a pork chop. I don't use that analogy by accident – while
a skilled chef might be able to use that fat to season the rest of
the meat, its loss does not greatly hurt the overall dish, and may
result in less unnecessary padding. So it is in
Razor's
Edge
, where Han and Leia have no
need for Luke to stumble into information about the enemy; they are
perfectly capable of finding it on their own.






Unfortunately,
without this side-plot, there's really no reason for Luke to be here.
Lando Calrissian would actually have been a better companion, if not
for the fact that Leia is not intended to meet him for several more
years. Luke shows up about halfway through the book, spends most of
the time aboard the
Falcon,
and has one scene where he does something exciting but not
particularly memorable. I can't help but wonder if his inclusion at
all wasn't a bit of a marketing decision: Luke, Han, Leia and
Chewbacca in each book of the trilogy. Come to think of it, Han got
his own book in
Scoundrels;
there's no reason this couldn't have been Leia's book without her
brother or future husband, with later books being dedicated to Chewie
and Luke. This would give each of the characters some breathing room
for once (I expect once I truly dig into the timeline of this era, I
will find that every day of this part of the war has been
meticulously plotted), plus the fact that I just gave an opening for
a
Chewbacca book!
Okay, Chewie was in
Scoundrels,
but isn't it about time for a book from Chewbacca's point of view
detailing some of the more important events in his life that we don't
normally see to be written? It's high time for the foreign friend no
one can understand to have his moment in the sunshine, but I digress.






Luke
isn't the only reason I think this book would have been better
without the added weight of Leia's traditional companions. She
spends much of this book with Han, which is largely a good thing.
Each has the opportunity to shine in their own type of story. The
problem is where they collide.
Razor's Edge
is trapped between the era it takes place in and the era in which it
was written. That means that even though many readers would find any
setup for the relationship between Leia and Han tedious, it's
actually needed as it hasn't been explored at this stage yet. On top
of that, no matter how far it goes, both the author and the reader
are fully aware that the couple's first kiss will not happen for
several more years. The result of this odd positioning is that out
of nowhere there are a number of really awkward scenes of Han and
Leia each acting like borderline sex offenders, staring at one
another at really odd moments with no explanation, even a moment
where Leia yells at Han for being too sexy while he positions not to
get a painful cramp during an important security discussion. There's
really no way to win here, as some fans would feel cheated were this
mini-sub-plot left out completely, and it's clear that this is not
the focus of the book.






Another
moment where Han and Leia crashing into one another is a bit more
literal. Han has a very specific style of heroism about him most of
the time. He is an action-comedy character, the one who accidentally
saves the day, or does so intentionally in the most humiliating way
possible. Even when there's nothing funny about the act in and of
itself, it still tends to come at a particularly opportune moment,
such as Han's method of saving Luke from the Death Star.
Unfortunately, this clashes with Leia's subplot, which is one that
allows her to partake in all the action-adventure heroism that is
more frequently associated with male characters while not diminishing
her role as a woman and a diplomat. All of this can't help but come
across as a commentary, intentional or not, on the state of Science
Fiction in general, as the writing and portrayal of heroines is a
hotly contested issue across the board at the moment. None of the
things I've described are problems on their own, but when you add a
bumbling hero with a tendency to save people at the last minute to a
heroine who tends to put herself in harm's way and is also attractive
to him, it's very simple to send the wrong message by accident. It's
easy to see the steps that led up to this mistake, which makes it all
that much more understandable, but also all that much more
disappointing.






The
last minor complaint I have about
Razor Edge
– and one that keeps it from being the 1970s-1990s era
Star
Wars
book it comes close to
being – is the humor. While I mention that Han is a bumbling
comedic hero, he is still written here as more of the somber veteran
than the noble clown. This book about piracy, slavery, death and
betrayal could really use some comic interludes to lighten the tone
at times, but the “lean cut” I described earlier keeps everything
focused on just how dreary and dark things are. There are a few
light-hearted or comedic moments, but for characters that lend
themselves so naturally to such moments, there are relatively few.
Where's Blue Max when you need him, eh?






Razor's Edge
is a good book, with some great action. This might be the first time
we really see Han and Leia – correct that,
Leia and Han
– starring in an action novel of this sort, and while Han pulls out
all of the stops that you expect from someone who has done this way
too many times now, Leia really shines as she is put to the test in
every conceivable way. As somebody who owns and loves a wide variety
of
Star Wars novels,
the negatives I pointed out didn't go a huge way toward dampening my
spirits while reading, but they did lead to some raised eyebrows and
hold me back from considering this to be one of my favorite
Star
Wars
novels of all time. If
Ewoks, Wes Janson and dreadnaughts shaped like a lightsaber are
essential to your
Star Wars
experience this might be one to pass over – ditto if swinging
lightsabers and mind tricks are – but if you count
Scoundrels,
Rogue Squadron and
Republic Commando as
your cup of tea, you won't regret picking up
Razor's Edge.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Podcasts: Big Finish, Gojira and Pacific Rim!

That's right, it's time for another podcast roundup.  As usual, there may be some NSFW language, so please use discretion.



First up is the first episode of Super Kaiju Podcast, where Mad Matt and I discuss Gojira with Matt Burkett of Monstrosities!





Also brand new is the latest episode of An Unearthly Podcast, with new co-star Eli and discussing our first Big Finish audio adventure: Destiny of the Doctors: Hunters of Earth, featuring the first Doctor.  How does our First Doctor newbie find this story?





If anybody missed it, check out our podcast discussing the strengths and weaknesses of Pacific Rim (although it did eventually devolve into a group of fans enjoying discussing the movie)!




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Win an iPad Mini

I have to link to the contest over at Laurie's Non-Paranormal Thoughts and Reviews for a chance to win an iPad Mini. I have a Mini myself and love the darn thing.



Good luck!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Insidious Chapter 2: Is it better to watch without the original?






In
2004, Director James Wan released
Saw,
a film that used elements of the 1980s slasher craze in a unique way
and changed the entire direction of horror for years to come. Seven
years later, He released
Insidious,
a haunting film similar to
Poltergeist.
Insidious was a
visually muted film with a high creep factor and very positive
reaction from horror fans and critics. This led to a similar change
in thoughts about horror, inspiring such films as 2012's
The
Woman in Black
and 2013's The
Conjuring
, also directed by
James Wan.
The Conjuring
had a very similar style to
Insidious
despite having a different writer and production studio, and many
viewers saw it as a spiritual successor to
Insidious.
Fans looked forward to seeing
Insidious Chapter 2
several months later, their expectations ramped up by the success of
the first film and
The Conjuring.






Perhaps
it would have been better if
The Conjuring
had held off – not for its own sake, but for the sake of
Chapter
2
. In fact, it would probably
be better if the audience had not seen the original.
Insidious
Chapter 2
is not a terrible
movie, not by any means, but as a follow-up to
Insidious
it falls terribly flat. Then again, anybody who watches
Insidious
Chapter 2
without watching
Insidious is likely to
have little clue who any of the characters are, or why Josh doesn't
remember his past. So let's take a look: is
Insidious
Chapter 2
better without any
knowledge of the original?






Let's
start with the visual style. To an even greater extent than
The
Conjuring
, Insidious
had a very muted color scheme. In fact, there were two distinct
colors that were not desaturated: blue, which represented Josh's son
Dalton, and red, which represented the evil spirits that were
haunting him. Here, the entire film is in full color with full
saturation. On top of this, red is in virtually every scene.
Knowing
Insidious, I
found this incredibly distracting. This might be because there are a
pair of spirits that are essentially haunting every scene, but still,
there is such a thing as too much of an iconic color. We get it,
Bruce Willis is a ghost; we saw that at the end of the first film and
new viewers saw it at the beginning of this one. At times, there is
so much red lighting that I half expected Freddy Krueger to pop out
from around the corner with a one-liner.






Which
brings us to the script itself. The Bride in Black (which appeared
in the original film but was apparently
not
the Darth Maul spirit) was actually this film's version of Angela
from Sleepaway Camp, who eventually reaches the point where he is
rampaging through the house with a bat and the audience expects him
to break through a door and yell “here's Johnny!” In other words,
the story is entirely unnecessary and reinforces that in every way.
There is not enough substance here to fill a film, and it feels as
though Leigh Whannell was desperate to have enough material to fill
the film, which led to several scenes that made absolutely no sense
and had absolutely no payoff. Would this film have been hurt in any
way if Josh hadn't spontaneously developed Donnie Darko-like time
travel capabilities? The characters are paler versions of their
original selves, with little actual character – even the spirit
that possesses Josh's body seems rather lost at times. Ultimately,
the connections between this film and the previous are rather
unnecessary. I mentioned earlier that the original film explains why
Josh has no memory of his past, but even knowing that the memories
were hypnotized out of him does not explain why they had to time
travel in order to access those memories. Wouldn't another session
of hypnosis been equally effective, and made a lot more sense?






How
about the scares? There are definitely some scares in the film,
which is the main reason why I think this might be a good film if it
could get some distance from the rest of James Wan's films. The
first appearance of Mother Mortis – or rather, the first group of
scenes leading up to her actual appearance – carry some genuine
suspense and fright. Several of the other scenes featuring her
without her son are effective as well. Unfortunately, these scenes
aren't enough to hold a candle to what we saw in the first film, and
there is just not enough of it amidst some of the confused writing in
which the script stumbles about, uncertain of whether or not the
audience is fully aware that there is an enemy in their midst.
Somehow, all of the tension and possibility for scares was cut out of
the possession plotline, which is extremely unfortunate when you
consider that plot is entirely the reason why this film got made.






In
the end, there are things to recommend
Insidious Chapter 2
for, but it's hard to find an audience to recommend them to. I
wouldn't watch this after the first, nor would I watch the first
after this, but if for some reason you never plan to watch the first,
you might enjoy this as its own movie. Still, it's very hard to
recommend this with it standing next to
The Conjuring
in theatres and with
Insidious
so fresh in the public's memory. If anything,
Chapter 2
feels like a sequel produced in the late '90s for a film from the
'70s, which is disappointing when you consider that the writer,
director and stars returned (even if Ty Simpkins barely appeared due
to aging two years). The bottom line is watch this film when it
comes out on Netflix, and buy a ticket to
The Conjuring.







P.S. Check the epilogue for
more of Jimmy's dolls.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

In Theatres: Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters




Percy Jackson and the Sea of
Monsters
is like if some low
budget hack job from the days of Bruno Mattei were given $90 million
and told to make
Harry Potter
2.5. Virtually nothing about the film is remotely original, nor does
it take any steps to hide that fact, the fact that the
Percy
Jackson
series is itself a
series of adaptations of the books with the same name
notwithstanding. The result is less a film than a formula for
instant film success.





The
film begins telling the story of three teens who – stop me if
you've heard this before – travel to a secret magical school, the
only place where they can be truly safe and learn to use the powers
they were born with. They are part of a hidden, magical world which
exists alongside our own but is completely invisible unless you know
the right way to look. While there, Percy finds out that he is the
chosen one, who is responsible for facing an evil half-blood and
either saving or dooming the world. From there the trio of heroes
call on a form of teleportation that is a cross between the
supernatural and the mundane, driven by an eccentric and featuring a
living prop. We've just managed to adopt the Harry/Hermione/Ron team
and the naming scheme from
The Philosopher’s Stone (and
all of its sequels), the prophecy from
Order of the
Phoenix
, and the Night Bus from
Prisoner of Azkaban.
Later in the film,
Harry Potter
fans will discover that Percy has found his own Neville Longbottom.
Besides the multitude of
Harry Potter
references, the prophecies in this film are done in the same style as
Disney's
Hercules, and
I actually found myself saying out loud at one monster “In its
belly
you
will find a new definition of pain and suffering
as
you
are slowly
digested over a thousand years.” Seeing as how this is based on a
book series about introducing Greek mythology to new children, it
might be overkill for me to mention that the only reason I saw this
film was that it was a modern remake of
Jason and
the Argonauts
...except
only the MacGuffin itself was actually that.





Despite
being a piecemeal film cobbled together from bits of other stories,
Percy Jackson and the Sea of Monsters
does more right than I could have possibly guessed. Particularly of
note is the sense of scale. Rather than starting small and
progressing to physically larger spells the way the
Harry
Potter
series does, the
capabilities of these demi-gods are all of a much larger scale.
Their abilities range from summoning war-zombies from the Civil War
and powerful aquatic beasts to summoning powerful waves to
potentially capsize a yacht. Watching Percy Jackson working to
control massive waves of water has a mythic feel that I would
associate with what a superhero movie should be like – and one that
most superhero movies doesn't have. The fact that this exists
specifically to emulate Greek mythology only makes it better – it
says that this project knew what it wanted, despite not having any
original ideas of its own.





That
said, I'd be remiss if I left you thinking this film was perfect.
The “three heroes”trope is stuck to so hard that the film
switches out the third wheel not once, not twice, but
three
times
. It gets to the
point that whenever a new adventurer joins the party, you can assume
that something is going to to happen to somebody else in the group.
For all that the character group hearkens back to the trio that made
Harry Potter
so accessible,
Percy Jackson
cut out one of the key elements of that formula: Hermione. Yes,
there's a girl, but she's not so much a nerd as...a girl. In and of
itself, including a girl who knows how to use a javelin and lends
support to the main character is not a particularly noteworthy
decision. Annabeth isn't a particularly good character any more than
she is a particularly bad character. This goes for almost everybody
in the film – Percy, Clarisse, Tyson – but doubly here, as she is
in some ways taking the place of the character who was the most
ground-breaking in
Harry Potter:
the knowledge-obsessed nerd who learned to tone it down while
learning of magic and friendship. This isn't to say that the exact
same trope should be copied from franchise to franchise, but given
the choice between a complex, flawed, driven, intelligent character
and a character with no particular interesting qualities other than a
bias that she has a reason for and learns to see past at the end, I'd
go with a Hermione clone. It worked for
My Little
Pony
, didn't it?





I
said that “most” of the characters fall into this bland,
semi-interesting category. The one exception to this is Grover. I
could not stand this character. What is it with fictional universes
that need to combine all of the minorities into as few characters as
possible so everybody else can be your standard white male? I was
able to easily look past the “white, female and ginger” grouping
in
Harry Potter,
if partially because I had never heard the word “ginger” used in
any way to describe a red-headed individual prior to reading the
Harry Potter
books, but that tendency has stepped up to extreme in modern days.
Gay superheroes are often minorities or ethnic in some way
(Spider-man, Bunker), and while I don't believe
most
writers are intentionally writing them to say that “gay people
don't look like us”, it still embodies a disturbing trend to keep
as many characters “default” (straight white male) as possible
while still including an acceptable amount of tokens. In
Percy
Jackson
, the token
tends to shift from black satyr, to Cyclops, to militaristic
aggressive woman...let's not read to much into that last one and
treat it like the lazy, accidental symbolism it is, shall we?
Rather, let's look at the cowardly half-black man, half-goat comic
relief, and see where the real problem lies: lazy stereotypes
substituting for writing. Was Grover this bad in novel form? I'd
like to give Rick Riordan more credit for this, but that is only
because of my clinging to my last hopes that a shred of human decency
exists in the world than actually knowing anything about what the
novels are like.





Another
comment that I'm not sure whether to consider a flaw or not is the
fact that this film is clearly self-aware. Anthony Head plays Rupert
Giles, except as a centaur. Nathan Fillion plays a half-serious,
half-comic relief character, who gives a monologue about how “the
best show ever” was canceled. I enjoyed these things, but I had to
groan at the same time.





With
all of these elements, I would be hard-pressed to call
Percy
Jackson and the Sea of Monsters

a good film, but I can certainly call it an enjoyable one. It has an
epic scale and borrows a lot of the ideas that made
Harry
Potter
fun. The
characters show some growth, which warms you up to them, and the
writers manage to restrain themselves from making the competitive
rival into a complete unbearable bitch
a la
the anime version of Gary Oak. It's fun to sit back with a bowl of
popcorn and point out things that came from other movies, but
probably not worth shelling out $12 for a ticket and $15 for popcorn
and soda.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Separate Is Not Equal: What I Saw in Blood's Pride by Evie Manieri






Military fantasy - and I am lumping in with this quest-based fantasy based around a military goal - tends to fit a general mold.  The world-building is a huge focus of this: it is where the stakes come from, it is where most of the characterization comes from, and it is what sets the tone.  Notably, this is not restricted to fantasy; it is very rare that a war story with a military goal does not draw these three things and more from the nature of the war and what parties are involved.  A Vietnam story has a very different feel than a World War Two story has a different feeling from a Civil War story, yet they are all made of the same building blocks.  Similarly, the conflict, the makeup of the military unit, and the origins of the soldiers are all important elements to these types of stories.





Evie Manieri's Blood's Pride is a novel that meets much of this criteria.  The largest divisions in this novel are racial lines: the cadaverous Norlanders, who invaded the Shadar years ago and took its people as slaves; the Shadari, a highly religious people with little military capacity of their own; and the Nomas, a nomadic race that exists outside of either Norlander or Shadari society.  In the conflict between the slavemasters and their slaves, it is the Norlander leader Freya and the Shadari Harotha that drive their respective sides of the conflict.  The Nomas, as you may have gathered from my description, exist largely as an audience proxy.  For much of the novel, there is one Nomas present, and he is an observer.  He is placed directly into the action, yet he is both powerful enough that nobody puts him at risk while being benign enough that he does not drive the story himself.  King Jachad serves a role in the story similar to that of Wendy Darling might in the conflict between Peter Pan and Captain Hook





As fans of the military fantasy genre are well aware of, this emphasis on world-building and conflict often results in sacrifices in the realm of the characters.  For all the J.R.R. Tolkien was a visionary in creating his world, the dryness that drives many people away from his novels could have been fixed if he had put as much attention on the characters as he did everything else.  While some of the best authors and editors can create a well-rounded story of this mold such as George Lucas's Star Wars or R. A. Salvatore's War of the Spider Queen, it generally is the exception, rather than the rule, and it's notable that both of my examples had three or more writers involved in the story.





Blood's Pride is no different in this manner than any other military fantasy novel.  I have no idea what most of these characters are like on their own.  I don't know their hobbies, their fears, or how they see themselves twenty years down the line.  I don't know what their relationship with their parents was like, or what makes them happy.  In fact, I don't even know what they look like.  I can tell you what two characters in the entire novel look like, and that's because they are both on the front cover.  Beyond that, there is virtually nothing in the way of description for any of the characters.





But Blood's Pride has a trump card.  You see, women's fantasy is known for a different set of traits than military fantasy - a traditionally male-dominated field - is.  To look at the far extreme, I've had female readers turn down the offer of free books I've recommended due to the concern that fantasy they've read that was written by women focused on the romance to the exclusion of all else.  As I said, this is an extreme scenario, and I certainly feel that I have better choice in books than to find myself stuck with something that focuses entirely on one aspect when that's not something I want to read about.  Still, sometimes, there is a point here.  A niche market of women's fiction exists when it comes to topic that most male authors are less interested in writing (or sometimes interested yet lacking the emotional tools) and that most male readers are less interested in reading.  There are a thousand social and evolutionary factors I could describe that have to do with this, but ultimately, we all know that Twilight was no more random happenstance than the WWE.  This has created a separate group of skills that most female authors - whether willingly or merely to keep up with the pack - have developed.





These skills are generally such things as emotional interaction between characters - not just romance, but the interactions between Harry Potter and Ron Weasley or the bond between Kal Skirata and his commandos.  Female authors (and male authors who have made a career catering to female audiences) also tend to be better at writing non-martial characters realistically dealing with fight-or-flight situations; they are much more often faced with an audience that wants a relatable survival scene rather than an inspiring battle.





All of this carries into Blood's Pride.  Where the environment applies stakes to the overall outcome of a battle, the character relationships are what gives the stakes to each individual encounter.  You don't want this person to die because you want to see their unique interactions with that person developed.  This character is clearly distinguishable from this other, similar character because their circle of acquaintances treats them differently.





The end result is that a lot of the flaws in the genre are covered up, resulting , in a more well-rounded overall story.  While the characters have little depth on their own, when you combine them in a group they become something you want to read about to see how it goes and what comes of them.    The end result is that a completely average story becomes something you are invested in.  Of course, in following with some of the complaints I mentioned hearing above, it could be said that the other character elements were neglected in favor of adding in extra romantic elements.  Honestly...I call bullshit on that.  There was every chance - actually, that's not true.  There was almost a certainty, unless Evie Manieri is in the top tier of authors, that these same elements would have been neglected.  The simple fact is, most authors are going to sacrifice certain elements to make others work, and most often these are going to be sacrifices so instinctive or tied to the genre that they don't even notice what they are sacrificing.





Still, at the end of the day, Blood's Pride is a perfect example of how combining elements that are traditionally used to attract male and female audiences together creates a whole that is more effective than either would be alone.  Without the military elements this might have seemed like a feeble attempt at stringing together a romance story between shallow characters.  Without the star-crossed and other romances, Blood's Pride would be just another rebellion story where the species are barely defined and there is not enough character to truly care how many of them die in the process of getting the story from Point A to Point B.  With both elements, however, the story is more fleshed out, and there is something for both "male" and "female" audiences to invest in.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Waiting on Wednesday- "Dying is My Business" by Nicholas Kaufmann

Waiting on Wednesday is a blog meme hosted by Jill over at Breaking the Spine to spotlight upcoming book releases.



This week's WoW selection is:



Dying Is My Business by Nicholas Kaufmann

Publisher: St. Martin's Press

Date: October 8, 2013

Pages: 384

Given his line of work in the employ of a psychotic Brooklyn crime boss, Trent finds himself on the wrong end of too many bullets. Yet each time he’s killed, he wakes a few minutes later completely healed of his wounds but with no memory of his past identity. What’s worse, each time he cheats death someone else dies in his place.

Sent to steal an antique box from some squatters in an abandoned warehouse near the West Side Highway, Trent soon finds himself stumbling into an age-old struggle between the forces of good and evil, revealing a secret world where dangerous magic turns people into inhuman monstrosities, where impossible creatures hide in plain sight, and where the line between the living and the dead is never quite clear. And when the mysterious box is opened, he discovers he has only twenty-four hours to save New York City from certain destruction.




What are you waiting on this week?

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Science Fiction / Fantasy Writing Program




While I usually write reviews or fiction, sometimes I try to do a little bit of something extra.  Part of writing is thinking outside the box, and Odin knows the only box I've ever been able to think inside of is a 1950s police box.  Add this to the fact that I tend to obsess over minor details and feel compelled to create lists several times a day, and it's only natural that eventually these things will start to overlap.





For some reason, people have been telling me ever since I was a high school student that it was virtually impossible to double minor as an undergraduate in college.  Naturally, I took this as a challenge, and the only surprising thing that I faced when writing this was that...it was so easy.





Of course, that doesn't explain why I came up with a course plan for a major and a double minor.  The premise is simple: A Science Fiction and Fantasy Writing Program.  The idea is that anybody who completes this course program will have received instruction in creative writing - specifically, fiction writing - as well as taking in enough knowledge to write stories about speculative fiction and fantasy.  





While there are a lot of routes to take to get here, I felt that the most universal choices for this were Physics and Religious Studies.  While there are a lot of types of science used in Science Fiction, but while speculative biology (for example) is more imaginative, physics is more likely to be utilized in a serious manner.  Religious Studies, on the other hand, assists in forming the mindset of most Fantasy characters.  Most Fantasy settings either make use of real or fictional religions, and even if you choose not to go this route, the concepts behind various religions are filled with fuel for believable myths and legends.  The electives were chosen in much this same way.  Interaction between different characters and different cultures is an integral part to writing Fiction - as is, of course, the ability to write it into a script.





The courses here were chosen using the Catalogue for Western Connecticut State University, the university right down the street from my house.  This catalogue changes from year to year, and will differ drastically from college to college.  However, WestConn was still effective for this thought exercise and this can definitely serve as a model for anybody who wishes to implement this idea into their own studies.




Creative
Writing Major





Core
(12 S.H.)

WRT 171W: Craft of Writing I:
Conversations with Predecessors
WRT 172W: Craft of Writing II:
Conversations with Contemporaries
WRT 273W: Craft of Writing III:
Writing Identity
WRT 274W: Craft of Writing IV: Form and
Inspiration





Required
Upper-Division Courses (16 S.H.)

LNG 317: Linguistics or LNG
320: Modern English Grammar
WRT 333W: The Editorial
Environment
WRT 373W: Editing and Copyediting
WRT 442W:
Publication Design and Development
WRT 465W: Thesis Project





Menu
Courses (6 S.H.)

WRT 276W: Writing about Human
Tragedy
WRT 303W: Composition III: Advanced Research Writing




Creative
Writing Option (14 S.H.)


WRT 219W Writer’s
Toolbox
WRT 271W Human Interest Writing
WRT 339W Creative
Essay
WRT 462W The Book: From Writing to Publishing
WRT 490W
Internship.






Physics
Minor
(20 S.H.)


PHY
110 General Physics I
PHY 111 General Physics II
PHY/ENV 136
Energy OR PHY 299 Student Developed Studies
PHY 170 Concepts of
Electronics
PHY 171 Introduction to Digital Electronics





Religious
Studies Minor
(18 S.H.)


HUM
113 Comparative Religions
PHI 202 Philosophy of Religion
PHI
218 Introduction of Asian Philosophy
SOC/ANT 232 Religion and
Culture
SOC/ANT 241 Socio-Cultural Survey of Indian
Religions
SOC/ANT 242 Buddhism and Culture






General
Education (42 S.H.)





Communication
Skills (3 S.H.)


COM
163 Living in Communication





Humanities
(15 S.H.)


HUM
113 Comparative Religions*
PHI 202 Philosophy of Religion*
WRT
171W: Craft of Writing I: Conversations with Predecessors*
WRT
172W: Craft of Writing II: Conversations with Contemporaries*
ENG
105 Introduction to Fiction





Social
and Behavioral Sciences (12 S.H.)


SOC/ANT
232 Religion and Culture*
SOC/ANT 242 Buddhism and Culture*
PSY
100 Introduction to Psychology
PSY 205 Social Psychology





Natural
Sciences, Mathematics and Computer Science (10 S.H.)


PHY
110 General Physics I*
PHY 111 General Physics II*
PHY 170
Concepts of Electronics*
MAT 110





Health
Promotion and Exercise Science (2 S.H.)


HPX
177
Fitness for Life
Lecture and Activity





Electives
(21 S.H.)


WRT
133W Introduction to Writing Fiction
COM/1NT
208 Intercultural Communication
COM 242 Script Writing
ANT/WS
236: Culture, Sex and Gender
WRT 243 Fiction Workshop






Total
Credits:
122

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS